Sunday, November 30, 2025

Typewriter review: MapleField

The MapleField typewriter did not disappoint!


I expected it to be junk, and it is.

This machine was made by Shanghai Weilv Mechanism Company, the last remaining manufacturer of manual typewriters. The MapleField continues the tradition of low quality established by the Royal Epoch, We R Memory Keepers (here's a video review by Just My Typewriter), Royal Classic, and other typewriters that are essentially the same apart from their names and styling.

Given my experience with Chinese typewriters, why did I buy this one? Well, it was a Buy It Now on eBay for just over $20, and it was in Cincinnati. How could I resist this opportunity for research?

The Royal Classic had a metal shell; the MapleField uses lightweight plastic. 


At least they figured out that plastic type slugs on the Classic weren't a great idea (who knew?). The slugs on the MapleField are metal.


The platen knobs screw in and out of the platen. The platen itself is surprisingly heavy, and the "rubber" seems to be hard plastic. This thing feels like a policeman's truncheon in my hands.


The ribbon cover design looks pretty good, until you type. Then you realize that it obscures the typing. Just plain dumb.


Here's a view from below.



The escapement operates well. Note how the larger gear connects to a mechanism hidden in the white plastic housing. That mechanism is a tabulator brake, which works very well: when you hit TAB, the carriage moves in a civilized way toward the left.


Unfortunately, the tab brake is constantly engaged, which means that the carriage return feels stiff.

Here's how the tab set and clear mechanism functions.


That video was taken after I corrected the misalignment of the tab stops and the set/clear mechanism. The mechanism was operating between stops, so it was completely ineffective.


Two keys weren't working, because the links between them and the typebars were missing.


With a little struggle, I managed to replace the links with paper clips.


That may sound silly, but paper clips are actually great for this purpose. They're easy to cut and bend into the necessary shapes, but they're very strong when they're in place (just imagine trying to break a paper clip by pulling on its ends—you can't).

The motion (alignment of upper- and lowercase) was terrible.


I adjusted the motion and got the MapleField to the point where it could type respectably. I like that "3":


But I soon found that the motion was out of alignment again. Why?? Because the entire type basket was too loose. 


The ball bearings on which the type basket rides up and down are not snug in their housings. The left housing has more "goo" (some sort of glue?) than the right. Is that the problem?


As I fiddled with the mechanism, trying to make it tighter, a bearing fell out.


Soon the other bearing fell out as well. There was no way to get them back in and keep them in place. And that was the end of the MapleField. 

As I've said before, these China-made designs are not intrinsically terrible. If they were made with good materials and quality control, they would be all right. Manufacturing and assembling this typewriter takes a significant amount of equipment and manual labor. Why not do it right?

But as it is, the slipshod assembly is a downright insult to the consumer, and everything is made of low-grade material. Most of the metal pieces on the MapleField can be bent easily with your fingers.

At least I was able to harvest some potentially useful pieces: the keys, mainspring, small springs, and feet. The box, with its form-fitting styrofoam, should also be useful.


I also created a PDF of the user's manual, which is now on my website.

Sadly, these terrible typewriters are selling well at over $200 apiece. Amazon says that the blue version alone sold over 50 units in the past month. I take this as a sign of growing interest in typewriters. But many buyers will be so frustrated by the MapleField that they will judge all typewriters by this one, and decide that their momentary interest was nothing more than a foolish whim.



According to a label on the box of the MapleField I bought, it was returned to Amazon by a buyer in New York City. How it got to Cincinnati, I don't know. In any case, it is now right where it belongs.


10 comments:

  1. Shanghai Weilv Mechanism Company, the typewriters we love to hate 😅

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good review! :-D

    (What a shame and waste of materials, that metal and even the plastic could have been used better... )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It really is a waste. The thing has many intricate parts and must take skill and time to assemble ... all for the sake of a terrible end product.

      Delete
  3. A hate type! Though I appreciate your assiduous documentation of its many flaws. You are doing good for the Revolution! I own a Royal Epoch for the sole purpose of showing my students the many quality differences between a "new" machine and an "old" one--which often leads to interesting discussions about economies of scale and why there will never be a high-quality "new" mass-produced manual typewriter. Though someone with more money than sense will surely eventually commission a bespoke, one-of-a-kind machine...if my suspicions about how human words will become precious is correct...but the FUN of typewriters, at least in this generation, is partly that they are both special AND mass-produced consumer goods. So you don't have to be precious about most of them and can invite your students to use them profligately. Are Swintecs any better? I read somewhere that those were till made for the incarcerated market, with clear casings...great post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And so excited about your novel, Richard! Congrats! I think mine is on track to publish in December too! More to come...

      Delete
    2. I've never tried a prison-ready Swintec, but I bet they're better than the MapleField, if only because they have far fewer moving parts. I do hope that someone, sometime, will spend ridiculous money to create a high-quality manual typewriter for our times.

      Delete
  4. Carrying across from other fields of interest—thinking in particular of piano repair—this machine would be known as a TSO: typewriter shaped object.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha ha, yes. Sometimes the Shanghai machines do type, though—unlike the fake typewriters that are on the market.

      Delete
  5. "policeman's truncheon" ... that made me laugh out loud. Maybe this typewriter is a part of the Revolution. It can be used as a weapon. Right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's true. It could damage body, mind, and soul!

      Delete